Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Intern Med ; 60(19): 3167-3170, 2021 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1511912

ABSTRACT

We herein report a 49-year-old man with a fever, diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. After two weeks of hospitalization, he suddenly mentioned visual field impairment. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed white matter damage and vasogenic edema. Cerebrospinal fluid showed increased levels of interleukin (IL)-6. His symptoms and white matter lesion deteriorated. After treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone therapy and plasmapheresis, his symptoms and white matter lesion improved gradually. We suspect that our patient was affected by a secondary hyperinflammatory syndrome related to cytokines, alone or in combination with direct viral injury through endothelial cell damage. The IL-6 levels were elevated only in the cerebrospinal fluid, suggesting focal central nervous system inflammation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Interleukin-6/cerebrospinal fluid , White Matter , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/pathology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , White Matter/diagnostic imaging , White Matter/pathology
2.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(7): ofab282, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1320321

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Detailed differences in clinical information between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia (CP), which is the main phenotype of SARS-CoV-2 disease, and influenza pneumonia (IP) are still unclear. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted by including patients with CP who were hospitalized between January and June 2020 and a retrospective cohort of patients with IP hospitalized from 2009 to 2020. We compared the clinical presentations and studied the prognostic factors of CP and IP. RESULTS: Compared with the IP group (n = 66), in the multivariate analysis, the CP group (n = 362) had a lower percentage of patients with underlying asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < .01), lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (P < .01), lower systolic blood pressure (P < .01), higher diastolic blood pressure (P < .01), lower aspartate aminotransferase level (P < .05), higher serum sodium level (P < .05), and more frequent multilobar infiltrates (P < .05). The diagnostic scoring system based on these findings showed excellent differentiation between CP and IP (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.889). Moreover, the prognostic predictors were different between CP and IP. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive differences between CP and IP were revealed, highlighting the need for early differentiation between these 2 pneumonias in clinical settings.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL